RE: Thoughts on the Latest SPS Governance Proposal

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Thank you for thinking thru this. But can you also take into consideration of BCX too instead of just purely level? This will also justify those half lvl up cards.

Using your example but with BCX assumption

Level 5 Common (60 BCX)
Level 1 Common (4 BCX)
Level 1 Rare (2 BCX)
Level 1 Legendary (1 BCX)

image.png

Revised
image.png

Another Example

Level 2 Common (13 BCX)
Level 2 Common (8 BCX)
Level 1 Common (4 BCX)
Level 1 Common (1 BCX)
Level 1 Rare (2 BCX)
Level 1 Legendary (1 BCX)

image.png

splinterlands
0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

I kinda like this. The current "best practice" is to only upgrade to full levels, without blocking more BCX than necessary. And rent out lower-level cards (usually at level 1, thus why so many level 1s on the market, besides the actual demand which is for level 1s) until there are enough to level up.

What you propose offers an alternative incentive for combining cards without reaching the next full level, while being on the same page with what the proposal wants to accomplish: to determine people to combine their cards.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I do it im getting like 400% on one lol But i do have maxed cards playing to but im not passing up 100-400% on some lol

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

What about a vote from a large amount of a staked token when someone maxes out a card

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I like this idea but it will really complicate the markets as rental and sale prices are determined by levels and not bcx.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

This is definitely a better and more fair way of doing it. It would encourage gradual levelling which creates scarcity as well.

But as more complicated (so longer to do) I imagine it will get overlooked.

0
0
0.000
Reply