A mini opportunist demon! - Weekly Challenge
(Edited)
Weekly Challenge! KOBOLD MINER
Background of edited picture from unsplash, @xianggao
Hi! In this post i show you the strategy that i was use in battle, and my opinion about the monster for this challenge i hope you liked!
I put in the firts posición: "Living magma", his hability was useful for resist for many turns is good for the role of tank in this ocation and have a good number of attack points
In the second posicion: "Magma troll" with "Reach" for attack from his posicion.
In a third posicion "Serpetine Spy" with the "Oportunity" ability for attack form any posicion, and with 3(+1 for cause of the summoner) points of velocity for grow the probabilitys of dodge and attacks first.
In the fourth posicion "Kobold Miner" together with Serpentine Spy form a little combo to weaken the range rival monsters.
In the fifth posicion "Fire Elemental" with "Blast" ability to weaken the second posicion monster.
And Finally the MVP of this ocation "Ant Miners" with "Scavenger" ability...
was increasing his life to face only the five remaining monsters (three of them epic)
The complete alineation was:
My rival of this ocation was @gerarde. If you want to see the replay click here. For information to join in this challenge click here.
My opinion:
"Kobold Miner" is a good election for weaken the range monsters, together with other monsters, but is necesary to grow his velocity because his life number points is relatively low. In short, it is a good choice to accompany it with good buffs
If you want to join in the wonderful world of Splinterlands be my referal clicking here
You can follow me here:
0
0
0.000
Thanks for your Battle Challenge.
@tipu curate
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 0/5)
Thanks for sharing! - @ashikstd
A mini opportunist demon? That's a nice title.
And yeah, you had a nice strategy.
The thumbnail picture actually goes with the character but you should give a source of the background if it's something that you got from the internet.
Thank you! You're right about the fonts, I already corrected it, thanks again!