RE: Splinterlands Rental Experiment Conclusion
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
rental prices are stupid low at the moment. New players could jump in and start making bank from the sounds of it. I wonder if there's any marketing push on that front?
0
0
0.000
You would have to back out the additional rental of SPS to get top earnings. Otherwise I dont think renting top level cards makes sense
This is a good point and an oversight on my behalf. I'm running this account on about 57K staked SPS. If I was paying 8% to rent that SPS for the season it would cost me another $3.40 (estimated). That brings it much closer to the break even point.
I also forgot about the SPS requirement. I guess is someone had a large account and wanted to subset a few accounts it from the sounds of it would make sense and profitable.
This I can help out with with SPS delegation think of it Guild perks
It's a whole market Supply & Demand situation.
Not requiring CP means that there are more cards than are currently needed.
This results in Supply > Demand.
However, initiatives, such as Land will sink some cards away from the Market.
The benefit is the pricing allows for everybody to access the game.
The downside is that Botters can maintain accounts for cheap. The upside for Botters is they accummulate rewards, such as Soulbound Cards, that may become lucrative in the future.
It is a tumultuous time. It is an exciting time.
botting is free anyway and you can pay with share of rewards