Adaptation to the new rankings system of the proposal ``Solutions to Minimize Bot Farms´´

avatar
(Edited)

Hey Splinterlands enthusiasts

Since the previously accepted proposal with the current ranking system cannot be directly implemented due to accounts no longer being confined to leagues, I suggest small changes.

The CP requirements will now only be used to limit the rating used for SPS battle reward calculations.
Here’s an example: Suppose someone only own CP for Silver.
Silver 3 starts at a rating of 1000, and Silver 1 ends at 1899 rating. Within this range or below, SPS battle rewards are calculated as usual. However, if the player advances to Gold or higher, their rating in the game increases, but their SPS battle rewards are still calculated as if they were at the 1899 rating because they only have CP for Silver.

Additionally, since starter cards are being removed, I propose completely eliminating the CP requirement for Bronze.

Here’s the previously accepted proposal in its original form.
https://peakd.com/@clayboyn/sps-governance-proposal-solutions-to-minimize-bot-farms

Sincerely, Bronko



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

shared as i see this as pretty important

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @bronko! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 1500 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 1750 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

0
0
0.000
avatar

I see in original proposal, you give example counting that 1x multiplier of SPS in ranked battle if you don't staked SPS. Now its already set to 0 if no SPS staked.

I think SPS should do its work already

0
0
0.000
avatar

the 0 x sps boost does nothing for the card values, it only mitigates the sps exploit and it also does not prevent soulbound/1bcx accounts from continuing to be used as feeder accounts. i have the overview of all current and announced changes ;)
after the sps and starter card changes, a 1bcx or only soulbound account can still earn in diamand. even if this account rents even 10x sps, the result is bad for our cards. i don't think i have to explain much, it's obvious that a 1bcx account that can fully earn in diamand is not good for the card values. right?^^

meanwhile the proposal is even more urgent than when it was accepted!

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

hello everyone!

we are currently working on an update for DAO proposal #57 as it was suggested by matt in the recent townhall. (ts: 41:33)

the the final text for the new proposal is still to be found, but we have set some goals that we want to archieve.

new proposals goals:

  1. limiting the single bcx bots, the low value deck bots and the soulbound only bots to a minimum by cutting their abilities in winning rewards.
  2. doing minimal harm to regular players while archieving goal 1.
  3. looking for solutions that are most cost efficient and practical for implementation into the game.

were hoping for comunity suggestions and ideas that will help us to make a proper proposal that mets the will of the spl comunity.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why only have it apply to SPS? Why not include GLINT in this too? I realize the DAO doesn't have control over that aspect, but you could put in the proposal that you will leave it up to the team if they want to make the same adjustments to the GLINT earned by accounts based on Collection Power.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"by cutting their abilities in winning rewards."
that would include glint rewards.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Peace
The latest town hall recap showed interesting development about the grain official market.
Thank you for your publication
I purchased 6 Baron and 29 Henchling
I am in the leaderboard but far from the top 200. I like the Halving ability. It is really helpful.
Are you stocking grain or just selling on the p2p market?
!PIZZA
#freecompliments
Regards

0
0
0.000