The Redistribution of Wealth in Splinterlands: A Barrier to Growth

Greetings, esteemed Splinterlands enthusiasts!

For the past two years, a group of individuals in Splinterlands has been solely focused on redistributing wealth from the bottom to the top. Instead of implementing measures that would bring new money into the ecosystem, benefiting us all, their actions have had the opposite effect. The barriers and paywalls for new players are continuously increasing, preventing new money from entering the ecosystem. This behavior can be likened to behave barbarically after a disaster.

Rather than fostering an environment that encourages growth and inclusivity, some individuals have chosen to focus solely on redistributing wealth within the game. While wealth redistribution can be a noble goal in certain contexts, it becomes problematic when it hinders the overall growth and accessibility of the ecosystem.

These individuals have implemented measures that make it increasingly difficult for new players to enter Splinterlands. The introduction of higher barriers and paywalls prevents newcomers from participating fully in the game and limits their ability to contribute financially. As a result, new money is deterred from entering the ecosystem, hindering its potential for expansion.

This behavior resembles that of scavengers who exploit vulnerable situations for personal gain. Instead of working towards creating an inclusive and thriving community, these individuals prioritize their own financial interests at the expense of others. This approach not only undermines the principles upon which Splinterlands was built but also stifles innovation and growth.

To ensure the long-term success of Splinterlands, it is crucial to shift focus towards measures that attract new players and encourage them to invest in the ecosystem. By lowering barriers and paywalls, more individuals will be able to participate actively and contribute financially. This influx of new money will not only benefit the existing players but also create a virtuous cycle of growth and development.

Conclusion:
The concentration of efforts on redistributing wealth from the bottom to the top in Splinterlands has had detrimental effects on the ecosystem. Instead of fostering growth and inclusivity, this behavior has resulted in higher barriers and paywalls for new players, preventing new money from entering the game. It is essential to redirect our focus towards measures that attract and retain new players, ensuring the long-term success and sustainability of Splinterlands. Only by doing so can we create an environment that benefits all participants and allows for the continued growth and development of the game.