SPS Governance Proposal - Tournament RF/GF Split Option A

avatar
(Edited)

DAO Sponsored Preproposal 2a

Welcome everyone, we're going to be trying something slightly different for the Tournament rework proposals. As we don't have a multiple choice proposal system, we'll be running multiple linked preproposals. The preproposal with the highest stake weighted support after the 7 day preproposal period will advance to a full vote and have a chance to be ratified by the SPS DAO.

The purpose of this proposal is to outline what the rewards split between Regular Foil and Gold Foil tournaments sponsored by the SPS DAO should be going forward. If this proposal passes, all tournament rewards for each format going forward will be split as follows:

  • 50% Regular Foil
  • 50% Gold Foil

This set of proposals is one piece of a comprehensive Tournament reform. There will be other proposals that address Rewards percentage by format, which formats the DAO wants to sponsor and potentially other issues that could be discovered throughout this process. Those will each be presented in a similar fashion for DAO approval.


Related Information

Current RF rewards per month:
682,836

If this were to pass RF rewards would increase to:
933,965

This would be a 36.8% increase to RF rewards.

Current GF rewards:
957,142

If this were to pass GF rewards would decrease to:
933,965

This is a 2.5% decrease to GF rewards.

For context we (myself and several community members) spent 3 months going over this stuff. Below is the "current rewards" and below that will be a bunch of random variations on what could be with each RF/GF split (assuming reward splits which have not been voted on):

image.png

image.png



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

50 / 50 by far the best of the three given proposals.

However, I would even ramp it more up in favor of regular foil, like 60 regular / 40 gold foil.

0
0
0.000
avatar

For sure. The options should have been 70/30, 60/40 and 50/50 for RF vs. GF. Let's not forget that GFs can be used in RF tournaments, which means that anything exclusive to GFs is already a bonus.

0
0
0.000
avatar

80/20 sounds fair given your comment above

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think such a split is a no-go for anyone I hope :-) but we will see, would not be surprised by aynything these days

0
0
0.000
avatar

Do we know how many players that actually play tournaments have those GF decks? Or how many participants do GF vs RF tournaments have?

0
0
0.000