RE: Thoughts on the Latest SPS Governance Proposal

One of the short comings of the argument here is the ignoring of reality that in order for any business to be successful or last long, it needs investors. If you destroy your investors to appease people who pay fractions or even nothing, compared to an investor your product is not going to last long at all.

I’ve personally spent a few thousand dollars on the game, which isn’t as much as some people for sure but if you aren’t willing to invest that money, or others aren’t willing, how do you deserve a better shot than someone who has paid into it?

What are some of your ideas for how it could work better or be less detrimental to the group of players you have in mind? Criticism is the best when you provide potential solutions, instead of listing faults. It’s also much more likely to get your point heard if you can say “here’s what I think is wrong, and how I also think it could look better”

I think your criticism is warranted because everything in life should be debated in an open forum so different sides can see what the other is thinking and coming from. I think it falls a bit short in a few areas but I’m also glad that you took the time to voice the opinion! Dialogue is great!

I’m not trying to treat you poorly but get you to think a little more about what you could offer for your criticisms.