RE: Thoughts on the Latest SPS Governance Proposal

As an investor of this game I vote "NO" for this PROPOSAL. You have to remind yourself that this is an NFT GAME. If you are a Whale or investor of this game you have to think twice, it looks positive and favorable to investors at first glance but there is a big negative effect in a long run.

Without more PLAYERS, there is NO DEMAND! PERIOD . It is easy to say that that the value of cards will increase if everyone upgrade because the supply will decrease but the Question is... Are there any new/old players that will play and buy your max cards? That is why I don't max out my cards because only few players can afford it. What's the point of having max cards if players can't afford it. All of us investors will just end up being a bag holders of cards and tokens. Players will just gonna quit and find other NFT games that has a better rules than Splinterlands. And all of us investors will gonna end up playing with the BOTS that we don't want to ban.

Let's face the reality, majority of the players cannot afford max cards. Roughly around 80%( or more)
cannot afford it. That is why they rent the cards instead of buying it. You also need to know where is your market(the location of your players)? Are they 3rd world countries or not?

If you want enormous growth in this game, protect the players at the same time protect the investors. We need a balance economy.
If you really want not to exploit the reward system then ban the BOTS.

We have to learn from the past NFT games that failed because investors and players quit because of GREED.