RE: ❗❗❗Crypto Company News and Giveaway❗❗❗ No.077 --->🔥Bang 56 to Earn that in CCD!🔥
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Hi there CryptoCompany people! I've done the reading about your various services, games, and pools. I had heard of CC before but only recently delved deeper.
To be terribly blunt, I am interested in asking a few things about the voting service:
Would my current posts qualify? (While they are all original, I plan to continue a similar style of posts for a while with the addition of more unique content as I delegate more jobs to people)
Would I be able to link other people's posts? (i.e. if they're being nominated for Post of the Month in the FC community and I'd like to reward their quality even if they don't win)
Could comments be linked? (i.e. if they're being nominated for Comment of the Month in the FC community and I'd like to reward their quality even if they don't win)
Is there a time limit to submit the links after a post/comment is made?
Once I find out more, I'll be ready to become a large stakeholder of CCD!
Edit: I'm also seeing which projects to incorporate into our reward system. CCD looks like a potentially promising token with an active project, but I wanted to give it a try myself before implementing it.
[@PowerPaul:] Hey! You are always very welcome to ask things you are interested in!
1: Yes, quality is an factor. I would love to support value contents on the chain. As far as I saw all your actual posts are qualified from the quality factor - I would vote all of them. Actually the voter votes for some authors/articles, even if the posts are repeating content and bring a value to the Hive community - this is not the greatest for me, but I do, because these posts empower our Hive community. If repeating content would only serve the personal benefit of the author I don't would do. So if you have similar or repeating post, but they bring value to the community, that would be fine for the voter.
Yes, you can include links of other Hivians into the link field. Normally I have some security restrictions like a needed reputation of 55 to avoid spammers. But when you provide selected/nominated posts, this would be okay - even if the author to vote has less then reputation of 55 - please check the addition at the end of my comment here. In general: if these articles are from serious users, this would be okay.
No, normally not and I don't would like to open the voter for voting comments in general - but please read the addition at the end of my comment here.
Actually not. But it could come that I switch this to "only post not older than 24 hours" in the future. One reason for doing this could be if the voting service has to many requests and the service can't handle this amount/needed mana.
Addition: I think I see your idea, which I really welcome. I would be open to talk about some "special mode" between your project and CCCEO. Which means maybe you could offer a vote for the monthly top comment - and maybe you don't would have to use CCD for it, because CCCEO would carry it. Maybe we can agree some "one hand washes the other" and yes, you maybe could offer this "vote from CCCEO for the monthly top comment" in exchange for a small advertising in/under this post section (maybe you like to have a CCCEO styled banner for that? I can generate easily.). I understand that this could be supportive for your project - and this is what I love to do. In general I am very open to make the best out of ideas and our chain. So if you like to get deeper into, you can write me on Discord server (here: https://discord.gg/BwMpHXsSjE) or directly via PN. My name there is "powerpaul", too.
I would look forward to! Have a great day!
Thank you kindly for the insightful and comprehensive answers, Paul! I'll be setting some orders to purchase a chunk of CCD and will also delegate 2500 HP to one of the CCCEO accounts this week. I'll PM you on Discord in regards to how we can arrange voting for post/compliment of the month.