Splinterlands what level should you rent your cards? Featuring Legendary Harklaw
Today we are going to analyze the legendary card "Harklaw" to determine if it's a better investment to rent out a level 1 vs max level card. Surprisingly the difference is minimal but the real benefit comes from owning single card assets for when you sell them in the future. Harklaw is currently a perfect legendary to start off your collection because of the low price. Grab them while they are still inexpensive.
First 3 people to leave a comment with their in game name will be delegated some cards from my main account.
Join Splinterlands!
https://splinterlands.com?ref=he-went-rogue
Youtube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHkWeJLGz8qjES8uPViMqKw
▶️ 3Speak
0
0
0.000
Congratulations @he-went-rogue! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 100 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPSupport the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
Interesting to see the minimal difference. I knew the single cards retained value better.
I wish I would have done this analysis months ago because I purchased older legendaries to hold/rent because I thought if the card was more expensive then the renting price would be also...but in the end it's still better just to stock up on the new cheap legendaries
Posted using Splintertalk