RE: DAO Deposits Stable Coin to HBD Savings, using Interest to buy & burn DEC daily

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Hey mate, the longer this proposal is on the table, the more I worry about this point. To ensure liquidity is available to enable the swap, it would take many days or weeks to obtain the HBD throughout the enactment of this.

It is problematic, and I may end up voting against(!) my own proposal if this proceeds to a full proposal.

I'm certain that there is enough long term liquidity of HBD, but it certainly won't be available all in one hit.



0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

We can reduce the HBD supply to be add in savings to start with. For example start with 50K HBD (instead of 250K) and in future add more if suitable.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, it doesn't need to go in all at once. The key to this proposal is long term sustainability and trying to get the DAO an "income" from interest once DEC hits peg.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is problematic, and I may end up voting against(!) my own proposal

I'm was on the fence but I'm going to vote for it after reading that bit. You've earned my trust. ;-) Even if you did say "get DEC to peg"

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't think liquidity plays any role here.
When you use the conversion tool from HIVE to HBD you create those HBD burning those HIVE (and viceversa in the other way), adding/removing tokens to/from circulation.
It's all about inflation and balance between marketcaps of the two system currencies this blockchain has.

HBD is being created and removed in a various way, but the conversions play the major role here in both directions. Other ways HBD is created is DHF proposal payouts, author rewards and interest.

Also this,

https://peakd.com/hive-13323/@dalz/rxdxls

And this,

https://peakd.com/hive-167922/@dalz/hive-inflation-for-may-2023-the-hive-supply-reaches-400m

0
0
0.000
avatar

Correct, but that would require Stable Coin -> HIVE -> HBD - which is fine by me, but some stakeholders may not understand these mechanisms and elect to vote not in favour of the proposal.

This is why I listed this as a risk.

0
0
0.000