RE: SPS DAO Treasury Upgrade

I really like the concept of empowering the DAO with a multi-sig body of elected stakeholders over one person “holding the pen”. However I think that since signatories would generally only be acting when authorizing a resulting transaction of a DAO vote, I’d expect that in most cases the treasurers would be in virtual consensus, and decisions should be unanimous. As a result, using a supermajority rather than a simple majority, say 8 of 11, or 6 of 9, seems more prudent to me? Open to other opinions though.