RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend SMC Contract and Define Strategy
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I voted YES.
I do not believe this proposal is perfect, especially regarding the complexity of the QPC structure, the level of authority given to treasury management, and the fact that several major changes are bundled into one vote.
However, I see it as the lesser of two evils. Continuing to pay SMC $5,500 per day while the DAO treasury is being depleted is simply not sustainable. Reducing the daily burden, limiting the development scope, and creating potential support for DEC and SPS gives the ecosystem a better chance of surviving and stabilising.
This is not an ideal long-term solution, but under the current circumstances, doing nothing appears more dangerous than approving this proposal.