RE: Do We Raise The Bars Too High On Content Creating?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
and dumping the traditional idea of quality content as held by many?
I want to believe this does not mean having contents that are not of quality. Although, for me I believe any content that lacks plagiarism amd errors, has the minimum quality rate already.
how many people can boast of having rich knowledge of them?
Exactly!!, breaking tables, at times some newbie like us get oppressed.
These people are on the leofinance, watching and reading the sophistication of bonding, adding liquidity, DeFi and so many other jargons, while they're finance enthusiasts, this generally gives the impression that's it's "LEOCRYPTO" rather than Leofinance
Oh my! Boss @joseddicus you are capturing a lot in one post. The rate at which I see more crypto-related posts than others will make one think this is leocrypto like you said. And most times most can not even related to it due to the jargons it entail.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I'm glad you like it, this truth is, we respect crypto as the leading niche when it comes to finance, but in the process of on-boarding we l would need to simplify the art of content creating because it also promotes things like engagement. I think the only way to do this is to have different q letters who are vast in different aspects of finance, sometimes I feel the finance world has more to offer and this is why there should be equal concentration on other aspects of finance.
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
That art of content simplifying is not common to all and that is where we miss out on newbies who can't comprehend.
Exactly and it will even reduce this perceived burden or notion about the community just being a crypto-only thing.