Time's Origin and Non-Existence
I sometimes wonder if there is any existential difference between non-existence and existence for no time duration.
If the two are indistinguishable from each other, reality might have used that as a kind of loophole to bootstrap objects into existence.
i.e. If time came into existence with no duration being indistinguishable from non-existence when time first appeared, then time's continued existence would create a non-zero length time duration.
When time starts elapsing within the set of all things that exist for no time duration, all that can exist for any non-zero duration of time alongside other objects would continue its existence for more than 0 seconds, which would instantly create an indefinitely large super-dense highly ordered mass under a tremendous amount of pressure, that pushes itself apart causing the big bang that formed the universe we inhabit.
My another theory is for example let's say time starts to exist
In the sense that there is (was) a start to time itself
All that can exist in time would not exist "automatically"
As possibly existing is not the same as actually existing
So only certain stuff would have started to exist in the (/at the) beginning of time.
Hi @z960,
Thank you for participating in the #teamuk curated tag. We have upvoted your quality content.
For more information visit our discord https://discord.gg/8CVx2Am
Congratulations @z960! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 1000 upvotes.
Your next payout target is 100 HP.
The unit is Hive Power equivalent because post and comment rewards can be split into HP and HBD
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
To support your work, I also upvoted your post!