RE: Archmage Automated Scholar for Splinterlands - Revised Whitepaper
(Edited)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Ballsy move. That just earned you a huge downvote. Asking people for 35% of their SPS when your bot has a ton of room for improvement is pretty crazy. If your win rates were solid season-by-season I could understand asking for maybe 10-15%. You will likely end up losing a lot of interest with a 35% ask. But perhaps people are crazy enough to pay it. Time will tell.
0
0
0.000
The initial fees percentages have been determined to provide us actual revenue figues that we can use to create a sustainable venture.
If we can continue profitably as a service, all our users benefit.
We need to scale up. If it is revealed that we can do that on a lower percentage, we may be able to reduce the fees.
Classic mistake in business. You will see, I just sold 5 of my tokens at a loss and will NEVER buy a new one unless your fees are 10% or less for the mainstream one.
Too bad for you too as I was planning on buying more because your bot is pretty good. But its not 35% of my earnings good. You will see, greed kills... I just hope you don't wait too long to lower your fees for the rest of the community (before you lose 90% of your customers).
On the positive side your bot is good, congrats on being the best developer to figure out the best meta.
ps.. when you think you are helping the community, just realize things like "automated brawls" are going to hurt more than they help.