RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Expand SPS DAO Treasurer Positions
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think its a separate situation because of my decision making role on policies and allocations of funds. We as a company don't want to ban others from participating, but I do think that for me and Matt it is best if we maintain that separation.
That's my opinion at least, and why I felt for me it was better for me to step aside.
0
0
0.000
Yeah, I would definitely agree it was much more important for you to do so since being closer to the heart of the team, although some could just perceive that the heart/will of the team (could) work through their employee... therefore separate but the same. Fundamentally for me personally its walking a thin line. Keeping Entities separate entirely is much better looking. But if we wanna start reading between the lines of Decentralization....just saying.
My apologies, but my mind is in like flow state on this right now since it doesn't feel right. On another note/perspective, Yes all of us hardcore community members that are still here trust the Team & Royal Eagle to maintain separation of power, but if we're about to be targeting a bunch of new players with this Cryto Recovery Fund idea where people are Traumatized and lacking in trust, they come in, learn about the space, & eventually find out a Team member is part of the DAO Treasury...they could very easily just see it as Team Member + DAO Treasury position = Sketchy. Separation mitigates trust for new players coming into the space.