RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern

avatar
(Edited)

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Let's just ban the people who abuse the system. Why penalize players like me who can't afford to buy higher level cards?



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

So this actually couldn't be further from the truth in your case specifically and I'm going to show you why. I just pulled your data and know exactly how much SPS you're earning and how many matches you've won in modern this year. You're not very active, but if you were and you were renting/staking enough SPS to do what you're doing right now, you're earning about 0.9 SPS per win. That said for the majority of your matches you're earning less than 0.1 and you aren't very active, but anyway let's look at what this proposal would mean for you specifically with the cards you have right now.

You could comfortably play in bronze and if you're good you could maybe hang out in silver, but you'd hit higher level cards probably.

If you're active (using your daily energy) and winning regularly (at least 50%) with bracket appropriate SPS stake/rent, this is what I'd expect to happen for you personally while playing in modern:
In one season in bronze you'd earn about 2x the SPS in one season that you've earned all year so far in Modern.
If you can hang in Silver and keep up, you'd earn roughly 5-6x the amount of SPS in one season that you've earned all year so far in Modern.

So let me ask you a question in return:
Where did this question come from and what makes you think this would penalize you personally?
You're quite literally the perfect example of someone that this proposal should massively benefit.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Where did this question come from and what makes you think this would penalize you personally?

I can answer this question. If he choose champ, most low level cards become unavailable and his win rate from 50% to 5%. If he choose bronze, all maxed out cards has a cap and equalize low level cards, the money spent on them wastes and his win rate drop from 50% to 40%. Worst thing is SPS allocation is very top heavy(champ has more than half), if you want more rewards you have to choose champ and spend more to max out deck. You may aruge it is designed to be it. but comparing with current system , this is penalty.

0
0
0.000
avatar

@clayboyn literally provided the math to show how it would improve his winnings and you just made up arbitrary numbers to argue and then said "this is penalty"...

DrStealth doesn't play in Champ - he plays in Bronze/Silver. If he chooses Bronze, where he is now... his rewards could double, if he was more active.

I think you're arguing just argue @fzhao 🤔

0
0
0.000
avatar

clayboyn assume drstealth win rate above 50%.
If he is 50% before, under this proposal which bronze legendary card max limit is 1, all his maxed legendary cards become level 1 and his win rate should drop(slightly or significantly, depends on his frequent used max cards number). Do you still think he can double rewards?

I see this as penalty. People bought what he can't use, and he was told he can use when he was purchasing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You ASSUME DrStealth has Max Cards - he doesn't.

In fact, Dr Stealth was saying he wants to use his Level 1 Cards in Silver because he doesn't want to buy extra cards to be forced to level them up.

Stop assuming things and go look, it's not hard.

https://peakmonsters.com/@drstealth/cards

Now tell me - how many max level cards does he have? How many max Legendaries?

You are ASSUMING things and saying Clayboyn is wrong without even bothering to look.

You know what's a penalty in my eyes - people making claims and arguments without having anything to back it up.

So yes fzhao, if DrStealth uses his same cards, played more (used all his daily energy) and had more Staked SPS to maximize his returns... just as Clayboyn said, he'd make more in one season than he'd made all year.

You're upset about the proposal, you think it will penalize you - that's fine. Vote No. But don't go around saying everyone is going to get a penalty when it's OBVIOUS they won't.

0
0
0.000
avatar

OK, it is not penalty for him, it is penalty for people who hold mixed cards.
But have you thought of consequence?
He may plan to upgrade some in future, now he drop the idea entirely.
He simply has two options here, update all cards and move to next level or don't update anymore.
He will go last.
Is this good for this game or company or DAO ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's how it's always been - update your cards and advance... or don't.

I think you don't like the proposal and are just looking for any excuse to argue.

You've already moved your goalposts and I just think you're being negative to be negative.

Cheers.

0
0
0.000