RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Subsidize DAO Project Manager Proposals
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Could it not be proposed to make an exception to the 100k dec cost for proposals coming from this entity in regards to official Dao buisness related ones? While this helps with dec control through burning it also continues to remove assets the Dao holds that give it value which In the end is what investors are drawn to. Just a question.
0
0
0.000
I was originally going to go that route, but had multiple people suggest the DAO burn the DEC. It doesn't matter much to me either way, I just need to be able to do my job effectively and I can't afford to pay out of pocket for every proposal we're going to need in the near future.
Congratulations btw and thanks for the prompt reply. Initially I was against the hiring but seeing more and more interaction from you, it seems we got the right person for the job. It's a shame you can't do a proposal with polls in them since this subject is a necessity.
Thanks! Hopefully I can change a lot of people's minds. Going to do my best and try to get everyone working together to build up our DAO!
id rather we exempt the dao like @smokelord suggested long term, but I will support this proposal as a step in that direction, I hope you do consider making a proposal at a future date that includes his idea.
I didn't really mind either way, but the burn was the option that got the most support.
I prefer that too @smokelord and glad you are thinking that way. Since this will be small amount of DEC being burned, I don't object. But if it was more meaningful then I too would have an issue.
I would prefer this. I think the 100K burn was primarily in place to make sure that we didn't get a ton of useless proposals. I doubt the community manager for the DOA would be doing that - and if so we should fire him/her :)
you doubt it but you have no certainty. this proposal is shifting our democracy very hard toward socialism. It needs limitations and controls built in.