RE: Increase price of Spellbook compensate with Rebellion Packs

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I disagree with that a lot.
The spellbook should be cheap, even 5$ cheap.

Fighting bots by increasing the price for spellbooks is the wrong way to go about it.

secondly, the entry to the game should be cheap. Clayborns idea with a starter pack option seems like a better way to go about it. I agree that new people should get 5ish packs to start off their journey but not by forcing them to pay more.

offer them a 5$ spellbook and afterwards 3 bespoken options for starterpacks at different prices.

spsproposal
0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar

We could probably have different 'tiers' when onboarding the game. The proposed pricier ones should be given something that can benefit the new players, but not something game-changing; this is in concurrence with the said Packs given to the players who chose to avail this. While also leaving the cheap $10 option in.

First of all, if there are people who are really interested in joining the game, it would let them have the ease of not having a headeach about what cards to get, since its already handed out to them

I suggest that it is not packs to be given away, but cards, and that the team or the DAO can soak up cheap cards that are sold in the market and have it be part of that 'package'

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I think packs are better. Why? Because it is good for the DAO and also Splinterlands Corporation. And: Packs are more fun. There is a random element involved. The onboarded player doesn't know what he awaits. It's just more fun.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

  1. It is the nature of Splinterlands that the token increase in value. The Spell-book should be no exemption. It should also increase in value.

  2. No, it is the right way. And much more easy than by fighting hacker with software updates, like anti-cheat (I am not against anti-cheat, but well why not target cheater/bot-farms from two angles?).

  3. CLAYBOYN's idea is a refinement of my proposal. A special implementation. The amount of the price increase of the Spell-book as well as the number of packs for compensation (or even multiple options and complete starter kits) is to be considered later and can be determined by Splinterlands Corporation and CLAYBOYN. This proposal is about the direction.

  4. No one is forced to pay anything. But do we want botfarms and player who make a living of Splinterlands and never buy any products, in spite of playing the game for years? Are you one of these players SWARMINVESTMENT? How much sps do you own?

0
0
0.000
Reply