RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Rewards Based on Card Level
(Edited)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
That's the problem with DAO's, Proposals are made by Mav's to benefit themselves. Then other's at the same level with high voting power agree as it benefits them also, and if you don't have the other 80%+ of the community voting against it, then you have no chance.
Flawed design in my opinion, because if you give everyone with staked sps the same voting power, then you will have the 10k bot accounts swaying the votes instead. I see the need for decentralization in crypto to get around government regulations (especially for US companies) but there needs to be a better way to make/vote on proposals to get a better idea of what the 'COMMUNITY' wants.
0
0
0.000
Decentralized governance is such a joke! Especially when they keep shifting all of the rewards up to the top 0.01% of players.
Good luck getting your vote to count earning .83 SPS/day while the top is earning and compounding exponentially.
!BEER
Yes it's a good one. In my opinion everyone's voting power should should be in a certain range. Like for example, it'll start with 1 and end at 10. It'll still depend on staked sps but for a certain amount of sps staked, it'll be capped. One can make it like 2000-3000 sps staked will give 1 voting power and even if anyone staking 1m sps, they are still at 10 voting power only. This will make the average individual players vote more valuable. Making it negligible for bots to make an impact on voting and on opposite end, suppressing the voting with huge amount of sps staked by biggies
Does the community want a large organization that is helping get new players into guilds and earn then letting the players that stay take tehe guild acount they played ofr two years or what ever . Also I mak surewe have what we neeed .