HiveBuzz World Cup Contest - Recap of 3rd Place match
Here are the results of the 3rd Place match
The so-called "little final" match is over and the third-place winner is now known.
The first minutes of the match were hectic, but Croatia sealed their exit in the first half. We almost had an equalizing goal in the last minutes of the second half, which would have given us extra time for this magnificent match. It is therefore Croatia that ranks 3rd for this 2022 World Cup.
Congratulations to the Moroccan team who offered us high-quality football and the most beautiful surprise of this edition.
Tomorrow's final promises to be spectacular and will close our contest. In the meantime, here are the results after this penultimate day.
We now have 531 registered participants who will share the 7052 HIVE from the prize pool.
If you want to join and participate, please read the announcement and the contest rules here before making your bet!
Matches - Knock-out phase
|Teams||Valid bets||Team A||Tie||Team B||Winner|
|Netherlands vs United States||161||127||0||34||Netherlands|
|Argentina vs Australia||221||202||0||19||Argentina|
|France vs Poland||382||348||0||34||France|
|England vs Senegal||377||340||0||37||England|
|Japan vs Croatia||385||187||0||198||Croatia|
|Brazil vs Korea Republic||386||372||0||14||Brazil|
|Marocco vs Spain||379||42||0||337||Marocco|
|Portugal vs Switzerland||396||351||0||45||Portugal|
|Croatia vs Brazil||368||24||0||344||Croatia|
|Netherlands vs Argentina||373||102||0||271||Argentina|
|Marocco vs Portugal||363||51||0||312||Marocco|
|England vs France||374||95||0||279||France|
|Agentina vs Croatia||353||252||0||101||Agentina|
|France vs Marocco||375||310||0||65||France|
|Croatia vs Marocco||283||167||0||116||Croatia|
PS: You can check the results of all group stage matches in this post.
Contest distribution and ranking
We are progressing in this World Cup and the ranking is slowly becoming clearer among the participants.
Here is a breakdown by the number of badges:
Here are the top 25 players. Remember that the sooner you make your bets, the higher you will find yourself in the ranking compared to other players who have the same.
They jealously keep their place in the top 3, they are @soluce07, @onlyhive and @andyblack. If they are not wrong in their bet tomorrow, it will therefore be their speed of voting that will decide between them.
But if they were to make a final and fatal error, it will then be necessary to count with @jats-0, @mk992039 or @viniciotricolor who will then all have the possibility of positioning themselves in the top 3.
According to the prediction sites, the chances of victory of each team are equivalent and no one dares to announce favorites. The suspense will therefore remain intact until the last minute, both for this World Cup and for our contest.
It's a safe bet that the heartbeats will be pounding tomorrow... Hang on!
If you are not listed above, you can check the Ranking Page to find out how far you are from the top.
Thank you to our generous sponsors
Greetings, glad to have made it into the top again. But, i think i should be a few places higher when considering the Argentina vs Croatia game, where i haven't received the badge yet. Apologies in advance.
Hello @flquin, we checked your bet for the match Argentina vs Croatia.
The problem is that you bet twice:
This invalidates your bet for that match and explains why you did not receive a badge.
Yes, i remember that happening. I thought it was very strange, because i was sure i had already made my vote. After that time (almost 12 hours later) i checked the bet again and my vote did not appear. I was going to ask about this error, but i think it would be more cumbersome to wait for the answer, that maybe it would be corrected and risk not having made my vote. So i decided to vote for the same team I had already voted for.
In the rules i hadn't noticed that about the vote weight modification BEFORE. I can prove that that was not in the rules before i made my vote. Please correct your decision.
That's what it is written as rule for every match.
Greetings, thank you for this information.
Please check all the posts again and see when was the last edition they made. I help you with a game.
Please share your observations.
In the first version of the first match (Qatar vs Ecuador) it wasn't.
But the first version of the Argentina vs Croatia match also had this passage:
Thank you very much for sharing this, i guess you are part of the Hivebuzz team. My pleasure.
This you show me i could take it from you, but it could also have been written at this time and show that date. Sorry for my lack of confidence. But, it is very different what i am showing you than what you are showing.
No, I'm just a random guy
A perfect. I thought you were because that part looks like the team if it was from the editor.
I would appreciate if you can show me how can i see that editor and maybe i can get out of my mistake. For me it would be of great help and excuse me if it is too much to ask.
This is my discord Felquin#3519
That's not complicated: If you use peakd it's the three dots at the end of a post
Then click on "View versions".
That's it :)
Thank you very much.
I was able to review everything i wanted to. You got me out of my mistake. I had stuck with the original version post. Sometimes, i get offline and when i want to read a post later, i take screenshots and save them in a document, the same thing happened with the one about the rules.
Then when i saw that edit i showed you above, i felt that they had created the rule for me.
I'm glad it was all a misunderstanding on my part. I'm a little sorry, but i'm always willing to fix mistakes.
Thank you very much indeed, for interceding and taking the time to guide me while the Argentina vs. France game was on.
You're welcome! :)
What an excellent discussion. Education, correction, thanks. It's even encouraging to read the responses from the Hive network when we're used to twitter and its responses.
Greetings again @hivebuzz.
On this occasion i want to apologize for questioning your clarification and your intentions. @lammbock was kind enough to get me out of my mistake.
Needless to say it was a confusion of mine regarding the rules, because in one post i had seen certain rules and today i see other rules. It was my mistake for not seeing and reading every post i participated in carefully.
Sorry for everything wrong.
No prob. We are glad @lammbock could help you clarify the issue.